CO129-064 - Sir Bowring - 1857 [8-10] — Page 196

Sr

} On S. Bridges's Smorn

admission I man

not

pustified in what I

wrote, there can hardly

be more

The

than

one

apmion

$1,000 at the thew

way

ruling exchange

as just equal to £250 Stelling the fee to a Counsellor in England of the highest Standing

with respect to the #250

Count of the Civil

for account of

action, I can only say

Thus

my

Solicitor informs

me_ the Monble the Attorney General's charges, his own, fee to a Chemist for analyzing the poisoned head, fees to special Juror's to all aggregate

but

Committing)

but a triple taken by D. Bruchts

over the Lu 195

for fees legally due

lun alone.

But it is to that

ao

to

other

part of what I wrote for the public benefit, and to the evidence on record regarding it, I in auld more especially draw

To your attention.

my question of the Acting Sheriff

to

what was

ar

the usual

Course pursued in the release of prisoners from gavl on recognizank that offices, M. May, replied "the uppering Magistrate generally

Hipendiary Magistrate (msheets.

or a